Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:43

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Scoop: Nike names Michael Gonda as chief communications officer - Axios
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Climate change leads to spread of infection-causing fungi, scientists say - ABC News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why do very skinny girls get more male attention if it is true that men like curves?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What do flat Earthers think causes the "magical downward force"?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Wall Street’s big rally stalls following some discouraging economic data - AP News